On Tue, 21 May 2013 14:45:46 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] wrote:

> I wouldn't go so far as to say that the U.S. is not a democracy. "Democracy"  
> is a very vague term: it means that everyone has a say in decisions that  
> affect them. It's not as good as it should be, but people in the U.S. do have 
>  
> a say, mostly via local elections (which are far more likely to have an  
> impact than e.g. presidential elections). The problem is that most Americans  
> don't know or think about these far more important elections and instead  
> focus on the President, who in the grand scheme of things doesn't matter that 
>  
> much. Then you have people focusing on preventing one party or the other from 
>  
> winning because they think disaster will come if it is chosen, when what they 
>  
> should be doing is voting for which politician they most agree with  
> (regardless of whether or not that politician has a chance of winning) to  
> show the major parties what the people want.
> 
> It is unfortunate that rich people and corporations have so much influence.  
> But it's still a democracy, not a totalitarian regime.

Look at wikipedia, democracy, the first meaning of democracy is direct
democracy. And sorry folks, but no country has a correct democracy -
like athenian democracy, around 550BC.
What we have is multiple representative democracies, not more.

-- 
"Un homme de coeur, un homme pleinement homme ne cherche pas a survivre
aux dépens de son humanité. Au besoin il donne sa vie pour préserver
son humanité."- Confucius.

Attachment: pgpc2jjtNQNDn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to