On Wed, 22 May 2013 21:20:47 +0200 (CEST) [email protected] wrote: > "Anarchy is freedom and only freedom - certainly not a simily democraty. > > Anarchy is no laws, no properties, no states : only freedom." > > The problem is that someone [unscrupulous] individual may try to take away > your freedom, that is what government is for. If a government is too large, > it will take away your freedom, so there should be a balance between anarchy > and tyranny.
The someone is the government. Anarchy is without government - it's impossible to do with. The principal sens of the government is to pick up freedom of people, to have more stability. Stability and not freedom. So if a government thinks is profitable to let go most of dissidents's facts, ok great; but most of them hates to see people thinking or having dissidents actions. A leaving community with laws justify a government - what it will be certainly unfaire because it retires people's freedom. -- "Construire des prisons pour enrayer la délinquance, c'est comme construire des cimetières pour enrayer l'épidémie."- Rolland Hénault.
pgpU080BWfzdY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
