I asked you politely to provide a citation. You instead spouted out three
comments of mockery, hatred and further claims. I am willing to believe that
this is true, if only it can be verified. Not further claims, verified by
reliable sources. For that reason we're all waiting for kernelKurtz to report
back on his efforts to disable it, and hopefully to re-enable a disabled
version of it remotely.
I am taking my information from:
http://communities.intel.com/community/vproexpert/blog/2010/02/04/intel-vpro-technology-privacy-and-security
I've actually been meaning to amend the Wikipedia article for some time.
"I will not give a citation nor a video. If you don't want to believe it,
don't." This is equivalent to me saying in a courtroom as my entire case,
"Your honour, my client is not guilty and I have evidence to prove it, only I
cannot remember where I left it and refuse to show it. If you don't want to
believe it, don't." I would have no case. Neither do you, without actually
showing your evidence.
I do not want to live with hardware management in my devices. That is why I
am trying to discuss whether the claims about vPro are anything beyond
claims. I notice you have time to search Google for the two links you
provided, but not for the one that would prove your point once and for all.
That seems suspicious to me.
By the way, I would advise you not to click here for fear of going to prison
for fifty years. Or here. And definitely not here.
