FSF maintains its definition of "free software". Even if Debian originated
within the FSF, it has its own "free software guidelines". Finally, the OSI
defines what is "open source". Those three definitions cover almost the same
licenses but not exactly. The differences can be argued. Why would the FSF
have to abandon its opinions on what is "free" and agree with Debian on
everything?
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports without UFW maccaches
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports without UFW gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports without... maccaches
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports wit... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports wit... maccaches
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports wit... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports wit... maccaches
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports wit... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports wit... maccaches
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports wit... gnuser
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Close ports wi... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports without UFW maccaches
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports without UFW mampir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports without UFW mampir
