> The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.
Looking at the actual source, he didn't even mention them together. Some
politician did, and he was just responding to that politician:
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubunt... migatheotaku
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure t... gnuser
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secu... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... erikthorsen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... erikthorsen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... vpro
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... erikthorsen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... erikthorsen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... Andrew R .
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less ... vpro
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than ... gnuser
