> *You* believe a system needs to be compromised for SSL stripping and *you* send me to "do some reading on REAL WORLD examples of how security is broken". Lol.

Well, I explained it to you twice, I won't do it again. You can't read plain english, too bad. Go back to school. You are just playing an act of not understanding what I wrote actually, so, even better, like wolverine said "go fuck yourself".

You are just another "wannabe jedi master" here in the forum. There are a few, and you think you are greater than other users. Well, you are not. And believe me, I won't reply back to you in this thread, so... whatever, write whatever you want. Everyone has seen your play by now, so...


If anyone else thinks there is a discussion worth having about this issue, please feel free to comment, I will give back any details I can. Also, if you think we could make Trisquel more secure in some way (installing or uninstalling something, changing any firewall settings, etc), please let me know =) I REALLY look forward to make this system more secure.

Also, as a final word to the Trisquel main developer: I was not attacking you personally nor your work. I don't think anyone was even. So, the only thing we want is that security becomes a main priority in this project. Trisquel is about freedom, but how can we have freedom without privacy, and how can we have privacy without security? I still trust this project, even if by an accident or by a bad decision it is not "exactly as I would want it to be", I still trust it. So, I still support this GNU distro, and I will keep suggesting people to use it. Trisquel team, we only want to be heard and we want this distro to be become not only free but also secure. That is probably the reason sometimes we seem to "attack" this project. We are not attacking it, we only would like to change it a little bit ;) without forking of course xD

Keep up the good work everyone!

Reply via email to