On 16/09/13 10:10, Fernando Negro wrote: > That is, unfortunately, another thing that only adds to my > suspicion... Because, the "WikiLeaks" project, that must be the > "alternative" media organization that I have ever seen be most > promoted by the corporate media [...]
The corporate media rides on what's popular, and typically the reason is for money. Greed rules the world (I'm not sure if that's a conspiracy or an accepted fact). > [...] is, in fact, a CIA project, that has already been denounced by > a credible author, that I've repeatedly mentioned in this thread - > the former KGB agent, who gives speeches in the European Parliament, > Daniel Estulin. Who is Julian Assange then? Were the cypherpunks a CIA front as well? > "WikiLeaks" is all about: spreading the idea of "insecurity" on the > Internet (by allowing "classified" information to be easily spread), > that will justify more control (/censorship) over it (pay attention > to the laws that will be passed, in the near future, because of > this); There are many excuses for limiting our freedom. 9/11 was one of them. WikiLeaks is another. That's not necessarily a reason to believe there is a conspiracy involved. > the "Collateral Murder video" leak [...] doesn't change people's > opinion concerning the Invasion of Iraq. Very doubtful. At least my own opinion of the war in Iraq was strengthened by the release of the WikiLeaks cables. > After all, if it does stand up to its intentions - of building a > truly secure network for private communications - it seems like a > good idea, doesn't it? And, my problem with it, is not even the > concept, in itself, but the possibility that this particular > implementation of it may not be as secure as it promises - and that, > therefore, its use may constitute a trap. I agree that there is cause for concern. Andrew.
