A healthy dose of skepticism is good, but when taken to the extreme I believe it's counterproductive. Also, I think a lot of this speculation takes on a very simplistic view of the world. Things are a lot more messy and chaotic than that, in my opinion.

Regarding Wikileaks, I cannot possibly see how this saga can have played in the favor of the USG. Quite on the contrary, from what I see. Wikileaks, and now Snowden have weakened the strategical dominance of Empire. It should be quite obvious based exclusively on how the USG has behaved in relation to them. Panicked stupid authoritarianism; the result of weakening hegemonic dominance. In my opinion.

On the bright side, if you are right Fernando, and all of these things are really conspiracies, it seems we don't need to do much to fight the struggle; just let them keep on doing the good work of self-implosion. I don't think so though, and I think that credit should be given where credit is deserved. I do respect Wikileaks.

I prefer to look at world events in terms of power dynamics and a lot of what seem to be conspiracies are rather alignments of interests and misalignment of interests within powerful players and not necessarily plots executed to precision from the meeting rooms of secret societies.

Powerful people and organizations surely must try to conspire, but there are too many power struggles and too many variables to look at it from a simplistic puppet/puppeteer perspective.

Also, believing everything is the result of conspiracies gives too much credit to the conspirators. The fact that people conspire does not translate to the fact that they are successful in their conspiracies.

Particularly, reaching conclusions based on logos or secret symbols is a bit much, in my opinion, especially in the 21st century. As someone else has already mentioned, why go through the trouble of making Freedom Box to trick people? And if so, why use logos that would reveal the true wicked intentions? It is a bit like thinking that spies should look like spies. The whole point of it would seem to fall apart if that were the case. Don't you think? It seems a bit out there to think a group of people are smart and capable enough to control the world, and then careless enough to leave us bread crumbs to follow their trail.

Reply via email to