On 04/12/13 22:34, dudeski wrote: > Nothing wrong with letting people decide for themselves. Debian > simply gives you the choice.
You are missing the point. People are free to have the choice to, say, run proprietary software such as Windows, yet that is something the free software movement should not recommend. Similarly, if the Debian project is hosting and at times recommending* proprietary software, the free software movement should also not recommend it. Trisquel gives users a choice to run proprietary software, but it does not host, nor support, nor recommend doing so. * As I understand it, Debian sometimes asks users if they want to enable the non-free repo on installation. Andrew.
