Re: [Trisquel-users] Free Software that is not GPL'd

[onpon4]

To what interpretation of freedom is a monopoly-based restriction of attacks  
on freedom a prerequisite to freedom?

If free country A has an army for defense and free country B does not have an  
army for defense, that doesn't mean that country A is more free than country  
B. It just means that non-free country C can more easily take away the  
freedom of country B's citizens than country A's citizens, so the freedom of  
country A is more sustainable. You can't say that it's unethical for the  
government of country B to not have an army for defense; it's just foolish  
and careless of them. What's unethical is country C attacking country B.