The whole community is harmed: users of Skype reinforce Microsft's monopoly and impede the rest of the group from switching to free software. And the problem propagates down to the operating system because, as far as I understood, Skype for GNU/Linux is technically much worse than Skype for Windows (ethically, both versions are equally abject).
Many good points were made. However, in my opinion, one important point is
missing. Skype is a communication software, communication involves at least
two users, and Skype can only talk to Skype. Forcing the interlocutor to give
up her freedoms so that she can talk with you is being a bad member of your
community.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad... nux
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad... franparpe
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad... Andrew Roffey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad... xnchgyqk
- [Trisquel-users] Re : When is proprietary software ba... magicbanana
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : When is proprietary so... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad... debianlinux
- Re: [Trisquel-users] When is proprietary software bad... ashok . biollay
