Well, what if someone does smoke, but they do not mind their health being
endangered at all? Sure, that does not make smoking good - I suppose that
over the time people set a common standard that damaging one's health is bad,
so this can apply here. But is it incorrect or unethical?
Let's take PhotoShop as example; unlike Skype, it's a tool a person uses by
themselves. It does not involve other people and the product created using it
can still be free. So in this case, it's only the one person limiting their
own freedom when using the software. Can we call this activity unethical? If
a person is okay with limiting their own freedom (We assume the person is
familiar with proprietary software and it's limitations), is it still wrong
of them to use the software?
Now, I did not really mean "bad" as in "worse". I meant bad as in "evil" or
"ethically wrong".
Thank you for reply.
