Well, we're not getting rid of it but, anyway, I think listing it as
something we could and should do without is OK, just in case it ever becomes
viable (though for that to happen I think hard work will be needed in other
areas. i.e. coming up with a better alternative, a new world order that bans
it, etc:)
- [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminated, ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... lloyd
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be... davesamcdxv
- [Trisquel-users] JS on websites: less about ... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code mus... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaSc... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ja... niknyby
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript... davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code... shiretoko
