That he lets the users know that option exists means that the users are told of the option of installing a wee bit of 'needed' proprietary software - it just so happens that he also advises against it.
That he talks about the reason not to add it to the approved distros list
means that he recognises its existence, and talks about it as well which lets
the user know that such an option exists (also I don't think he's advising
users against Debian, he just doesn't want to guide the least knowledgable
ones to Debian and have them install non-free things there. On the other
hand, if you walk for a job interview with the FSF with Debian on your
computer, with the nn-free repos disabled and nothing proprietary in it,
you'll be fine, I think).
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free... jadonplevesque
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd ... LDrumbler
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/H... jadonplevesque
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free... Andrew Roffey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free... lloyd
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free... davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd ... LDrumbler
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/H... davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/H... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free... Lev Lazinskiy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? jadonplevesque
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? davesamcdxv
