Honestly, why can't they list debian as 'partially approved', explaining with
a little '*' that they don't endorse the use of the non-free repos and the
'evil doings' of the debian project?
I still think this would be ridiculous but at least one big popular distro
would be on that list.
But no, make instead way for 'ututo' and 'blag' which are practically
unusable.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? jadonplevesque
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? arielgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? davesamcdxv
