Yes, it is contradicting in the case that the formatting would be correct ( I just considered two different cases). Now the latter is correct. Whatever you name your interface on that file should take effect.

"Note: If the configuration file is correctly configured your Atheros interface should always be named wlan1 and not 0, in the current file."

This was because of the script. You were trying to detect the configuration for wlan0 and the file was forcing the Atheros card to be named wlan1.

Reply via email to