If a non-free compiler is required, then it's not a matter of convenience or preference but instead you're unable to use the package in freedom. In Trisquel such a package would be considered non-free.
> I also don't recall anything about software freedom that would favor
convenience, or favor one set of APIs over another set of APIs (as might
affect building programs with a Free C++ compiler versus some non-free C++
compiler) without some clear adverse effect on a user's freedoms to run,
study, share, and modify the software. Those concerns all strike me to be
developmental details.
- [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used ReactOS (a non-GNU... deavmi
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used ReactOS (... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used React... deavmi
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used React... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used R... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever us... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used R... t8mf4nu6lizp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used ReactOS (... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used ReactOS (... franparpe
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used ReactOS (... mail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Anybody ever used ReactOS (... davesamcdxv
