> I also don't recall anything about software freedom that would favor convenience, or favor one set of APIs over another set of APIs (as might affect building programs with a Free C++ compiler versus some non-free C++ compiler) without some clear adverse effect on a user's freedoms to run, study, share, and modify the software. Those concerns all strike me to be developmental details.

If a non-free compiler is required, then it's not a matter of convenience or preference but instead you're unable to use the package in freedom. In Trisquel such a package would be considered non-free.

Reply via email to