The law is getting worse around the world. There is news that not only is the FCC looking to further force manufacturers to lock down wifi, and thus pretty much everything in practice, equivalent organizations (Canada and Europe) in other countries have identical or similar rules they are working on.
I won't advocate for this at the moment as its self-defeating and thinking
"we can just make our own hardware and smuggle it in" isn't a feasible
option. You need cooperation that we already don't have. If we did we'd have
more free software firmware- or at least leaks of the code. We don't. And the
way things are going what you can get around *without a lot of reverse
engineering effort put in* potentially won't be possible tomorrow because of
locks (signature checking of the firmware). Unless you have some magical way
of getting those keys leaked even if we can reverse engineer it (we can't,
not really, not on a wide scale anyway) then the resulting code won't run
anyway.
- [Trisquel-users] Will open firmware exist in 5 years? Linux 4... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Will open firmware exist in 5 years... tomlukeywood
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Will open firmware exist in 5 years... elkingrey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Will open firmware exist in 5 y... tomlukeywood
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Will open firmware exist in... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Will open firmware exist in 5 years... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Will open firmware exist in 5 years... neutr0n
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Will open firmware exist in 5 years... jason
