What exactly has Canonical wanted that Wayland does not provide? Apart from Canonical's corporate control (through contributor license agreements)? The wiki page that was announcing Mir was showing a great ignorance on what problems Wayland was solving so that the page could state that Mir will solve problems that Wayland won't. It was plain wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir_%28software%29#Controversy
That's why companies like Canonical decided to do their own thing with Mir.
They were never going to get what they wanted with Wayland and the other
Wayland devs wouldn't play nice with Canonical.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do DRM free games matter even if the gam... cdwaldrum
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do DRM free games matter even if the gam... cdwaldrum
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do DRM free games matter even if th... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do DRM free games matter even i... 166291
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do DRM free games matter ev... tegskywalker
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Do DRM free games matter even ... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do DRM free games matter ev... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do DRM free games matte... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do DRM free games matter even if the gam... cdwaldrum
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Do DRM free games matter even if the gam... ethernet252
