>> The definition you gave (i.e., the code is gratis) is not what "free software" is about.
You quote the way the FSF pitches libre software and the way OSI pitches
libre software. I could also cite these quotes as evidence of two discourses
within one practical movement to develop libre software. This is not evidence
of the two movements claim, just another way of restating it as its own
proof.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably mis... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably... strypey
- [Trisquel-users] Re : I've probabl... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably... strypey
- [Trisquel-users] Re : I've probabl... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably misunderstood the differe... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably misunderstood the differe... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] I've probably misunderstood the differe... strypey
