In fact, I've argued in the opposite direction. Because the difference between GNOME Flashback and LXDE is so small, I think the main version of Trisquel should just be regular GNOME. Mini could either be kept as LXDE, or changed to MATE; either way, it would suffice for most available old systems.
Don't be silly. GNOME Flashback's requirements aren't too heavy for most
available systems, and the same applies to LXDE. The DEs you're suggesting
are extremely lightweight, sure, but that comes at a cost of
user-friendliness. People who want them should do a net-install.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What version should I choose? Mini or ... santiagomolins
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What version should I choose? Mini or ... ivaldaloucha
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What version should I choose? Mini or ... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What version should I choose? Mini or ... santiagomolins
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What version should I choose? Mini or ... dahunt
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What version should I choose? Mini or ... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What version should I choose? Mini or ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What version should I choose? Min... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] What version should I choose?... onpon4
