I think if LowRISC computers were available for sale, and they were
freedom-respecting computers, then many people here would purchase one in a
heartbeat.
However, since we are discussing computer architectures that have not been
widely implemented, if at all, it is more desirable to pick a standard that
has a stronger stance in forcing modifications to the architecture to be
released.
Otherwise we have a situation like Android: everyone will pick a mobile
computer running Android over one running a completely proprietary operating
system, but Android's pushover license means that almost all implementations
of Android are proprietary.
- [Trisquel-users] will you distribute information about lowris... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute information abo... jabjabs
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute information... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute informa... dguthrie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute informa... jabjabs
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute information... strypey
