I think if LowRISC computers were available for sale, and they were freedom-respecting computers, then many people here would purchase one in a heartbeat. However, since we are discussing computer architectures that have not been widely implemented, if at all, it is more desirable to pick a standard that has a stronger stance in forcing modifications to the architecture to be released. Otherwise we have a situation like Android: everyone will pick a mobile computer running Android over one running a completely proprietary operating system, but Android's pushover license means that almost all implementations of Android are proprietary.

Reply via email to