When a ' program does not have Free Software, it is not because its author wants to control you.

Yes, it is.

It is just because nobody worked on it.

Choosing a free software license does not require more work than choosing a proprietary software license.

Instead you want to force the author to write a Free Software (what is not even always possible: ')

It is always possible. Proprietary software could be illegal (it harms our freedoms)... but we are not there yet.

I accept to discuss about the different between simply features and liberty features.

Freedom is not a feature.

I understand and remark the different between 'easy of use' and 'freedom of use'

Why would it be different for the command line interface?!

When exist people blind (for example), talking about OS, without some features it can not be achieved any freedom.

The user cannot use a free software program if it is inaccessible. But that does not mean the program (or its developers) controls the users. Accessibility is a feature. A required feature for many users but a feature anyway. Not a freedom.

But now, from my point of view, an easy way to brute-translate it, at least, must be able to incorporate (like OS installation).

Sorry I cannot make sense of this sentence. It is a language I do not understand. But you have not denied my freedoms because you wrote in a language I do not understand. i18n is a feature.

Proprietary Software is written in a 'different' language that programmers don't understand, right?

Wrong. Any programming language can be used to write any software, free or proprietary. If the language is compiled (such as C), then a binary (that corresponds to the source code) is created and is not human-readable. The binary can be free or proprietary. Now, if the binary is free, that means the corresponding source code is distributed to the users (freedom 1 or 3 require that). If the binary is proprietary the source code is (typically) not distributed to the users, who therefore are helpless. But, you see, the difference is not technical. At all.

Reply via email to