Payments can corrupt. They can create dependencies and influence decisions. Is there a threshold in terms of what payments are unacceptable? Should fsf accept money that likely was made on software which is contrary to fsf policies? Saying it is not a matter, is ignorance. I think google payments are unacceptable payments. Why google pays does not matter. I think they pay, because they can profit from free software. About hp you could say it is non free software computers. Nothing is proven about what the software does. That is why hp payments are acceptable. If payments clearly source from pieces of software which are contrary to fsf stance, fsf should not accept them.

Reply via email to