How does this violate the free software guidelines? Is it like the upcoming Nouveau drivers for Nvidia where the code itself is "open source" but in reality it requires non-free code (additional firmware or a key or whatever) from the vendor in order to work?
I'm not trolling, just actually really curious about this one. AMD's amdgpu
kernel driver is considered an "open source" version of their driver, and
many improvements are in store for the 4.7 kernel like Polaris support.
According to the Linux Libre kernel, it is considered non-free and therefore
deblobbed.
- [Trisquel-users] amdgpu is considered "open so... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] amdgpu is considered &quo... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] amdgpu is considered &quo... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] amdgpu is considered ... jeremiah
- Re: [Trisquel-users] amdgpu is conside... dguthrie
- [Trisquel-users] Re : amdgpu is co... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] amdgpu i... dguthrie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] amdgpu is con... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
