Although it is certainly closer to a democracy than what's been set up since, and much closer than the 'democracy' in place today, Athens still didn't have democracy per se (though others may beg to differ with me here). Only participating citizens could vote- that excluded women, children, and- although I may be misremembering here- those without sufficient assets.

Now of course, nobody wants this issue "fixed" completely- gender and wealth are unfair grounds for exclusion, but age is not. However, this is a fundamental problem with democracy: in order to ensure governments fairly represent of public opinion, we must exclude those who can't reasonably be considered capable of forming an informed opinion- and who that is gets decided by the government! This is why it's so important to ensure we have a reliable means of capturing the opinions of those who are unrepresented- and that means is scientifically rigorous investigation. The proliferation of reliable information, whether or not it expresses 'acceptable' views or is something with mainstream interest, is key to the functioning of a fair democracy in so many ways. That's why restrictions on free speech itself, excessive copyright, the abundance of weak studies in medicine and psychology, and emotion-fuelled political campaigns are so threatening to politics. Of course, these pale in comparison to the fact that the only stable part of a typical Western democracy is a media-controlled ritual of choosing the least unappealing set of policies every few years.

Reply via email to