OK, I will concede that poor artists use unethical licensing restrictions. It still doesn't help them, but whatever. The important point is that it's unethical extortion, and the secondary point is that it doesn't affect big corporations at all, and therefore there is no possible justification for it. Both of these points stand independently of what poor artists actually do.

For what it's worth, I'm sorry that I made generalized assumptions about the working poor. I had the wrong image in my head when I was thinking about them. I will keep this in mind in the future.

Reply via email to