We should indeed not trust Microsoft to have the user's best interests in
mind, but the message they've given is a good and valid one. The key here is
to make sure we don't settle for anything less than we expect, and certainly
no less than the now (weakly) reformed company has suggested we do. That, of
course, means we must not let them make only the easiest contributions to
freedom (or source exposure, as is often the case) in exchange for
hypocritically maintaining the most profitable immorality. A few pawns make
nice ornaments, but freedom rests on the game.
- [Trisquel-users] microsoft against surveillance, th... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft against surveil... Ignacio Agulló
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft against surveil... J.B. Nicholson
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft against sur... infinityfallen
- [Trisquel-users] Re : microsoft agains... pinmaritim
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft against surveil... enduzzer
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft against surveil... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft against surveil... calmstorm
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft against surveil... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft against sur... calmstorm
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft against... encryptedram
- Re: [Trisquel-users] microsoft aga... infinityfallen