I could respect Purism more if it weren't for their company's name (and the
name of their OS, PureOS).
It's one thing to present yourself as offering the most free product
currently possible with modern specifications and styling, while being up
front that modern specifications and styling currently require some
compromises to freedom, which you are working to overcome in the future but
which is not available right now. A name consistent with that would be
something like FreedomChasers, or FreedomPath, or something like that.
But the use of Pure and any derivative of that word misleadingly implies 100%
pure, total software freedom, no asterisks, no fine print, no compromise, as
the company's top priority over everything else, including specs, style, you
name it, and that that purity exists in their products NOW. And that's just
NOT what they do, and not what they offer.
