Seems to me that this software that's 'bootstrapping the user space' should be pretty much transparent to the higher-level packages.
I agree that packages shouldn't have unnecessary dependencies - that doesn't
seem to be in the spirit of free software. But, why would package developers
include a dependency on systemd, if it's not required? Just because they're
fanboys of it?
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About sy... davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Abou... i_write_words
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About systemd onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About systemd davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About systemd greatgnu
- [Trisquel-users] Re : About systemd lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : About system... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About systemd jbar
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About systemd leestrobel
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About systemd calmstorm
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About systemd leestrobel
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About systemd onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About systemd leestrobel
- Re: [Trisquel-users] About sy... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Abou... leestrobel
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Abou... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Abou... leestrobel
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Abou... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Abou... leestrobel
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Abo... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Abou... leestrobel
