You throw the baby out with the bathwater, which irritates me very much. On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 19:47 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Could you please explain what freedom issues (apart from the one mentioned by > > me) there are? I have always thought Chromium is FLOSS.
If you're concerned about privacy issues in Mozilla, then how could you ever consider Chromium? Chromium's privacy issues are even more difficult to remove, and people are still trying to figure it out. > But I am not a programmer. And it seems no programmer has taken care to > remove them, yet the vendors claim it is free software respecting privacy and > > people believe that. If someone's not doing it fast enough, pay them to go faster. > Perhaps I need to find an command line tool or > get rid of RSS totally... What. On. Earth. You are making no sense. You take no initiative to use the rights you hold so dear. You just sit back and take anything the developer gives you, as if the software were proprietary. Just because all the clients in the world are garbage is absolutely no justification for refusing to ever use the protocol. That's insanity. Just wait for a better client, whether one that someone else makes or one you pay someone to make. -- Caleb Herbert OpenPGP public key: http://bluehome.net/csh/pubkey
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
