> heyjoe cannot properly study any specific problem. Even less fight against
them. He ends up only complaining that the world is a terrible place. Worse,
he apparently blames the four freedom for not being a perfect solution to all
"the terrible things going on in the world" and therefore considers them
moot.
1. You don't have the slightest idea what I can and cannot study. Nobody has
asked about your personal evaluations too.
2. I have no obligation to fight for or against anything. So nobody has asked
about how your unsolicited personal evaluations look in a different context.
3. By mixing your crooked interpretations with excerpts from the actual
person's words and decorating them with words like "even less", "worse" you
create a mess of unsolicited personal remarks, make conclusions based on all
that ("apparently") and assign all this to the other person who was actually
talking about something entirely different. You literally put words into the
mouth of another and blame the other for that.
I told you - I won't play this game. In another thread I told you also: if
something is unclear - ask. This is the normal way people to understand each
other. Not to invent something and tell the other "you are that" or "you
think that" or "you are less/more".
