> But that is certainly not a reason to "remove the 'ethics' and 'freedom'".
"that" is not a reason because your "that" is not what I explained.
On various occasions I notice that you like to take my words out of context
and gently push their meaning into a completely different one, then provide
some proof that in the other context they are wrong. Of course you like the
context to be convenient enough, so others who misunderstand my words can
stick to yours.
Initially I thought that you were doing it because of misunderstanding, so I
explained more and more. But you keep doing it even after lots of
explanations and considering the previous and recent disrespectful comments
made in 3rd person which you allow yourself to make, I understand that I was
wrong in my initial assumption.
In any case I won't play this game with you. If you keep doing it, I simply
won't answer.
So much for 'ethics'.
