> True, but wouldn't that mean having to import an increasing number of > packages from elsewhere?
I'm not sure exactly how much extra work it would be. It would certainly help if there were an arch32-like community project. That said, I don't see any reason to expect Ubuntu to drop 32-bit support any time soon. They support a variety of architectures, unlike Arch who only supported x86 and seemed to reduce support to one architecture to save effort. > While we're discussing Etiona, am I correct to presume that Mate will be > the default desktop again? I haven't heard otherwise. > So for > Trisquel 10, it seems that it will be time to either retire Mini, or > choose another default desktop, one that's significantly lighter than > Mate. Maybe now is the time to start discussing candidates A while back I set up a low-resource netbook with Trisquel using Icewm instead of a full DE. Some screenshots here: https://trisquel.info/en/forum/solved-problem-lxde#comment-137293
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
