I think you are naive
I usually take such an expression as a compliment but in this case it might
not qualify for one since you seem to ignore the facts:
Since there seems to be no evidence we can't allow ourselves to conclude that
he was forced *BY* FSF and hence not that FSF should be sanctioned.
Experience has taught me that a third possible scenario could be
- The quitter doesn't reckon his or her given action as a mistake in itself,
but reckon that the particular action may be interpreted and treated in ways
that might damage the organisation which the quitter was working for, and
therefore considers a resignation as a (perhaps the best) means to avoid
(further) damage to that organisation.
Since there seems to be no *evidence* we can't allow ourselves to *conclude*
that he was forced *BY* FSF and hence not that FSF should be sanctioned.
