However, as I thought, one of the most fun elements of painting is competing for accuracy, is lost in computer graphics inherently. Second, I still feel that anything between 0 and 1 is always (literally perfectly) lost in computer graphics. Random numbers are not something between 0 and 1. These two are important pleasures in painting, and those inherent defects has hindered my enthusiasm. Drawing to prove "I am the most accurate" is the most fundamental factor that stimulate me to concentrate, at least for me, it is so. I am already getting bored somewhat... I think there might be something computer graphic's own pleasures that can stimulate me, though. I have not found that yet. I guess it is concerned with fraud, such as random numbers. Any clue? Would Trisquel have something own medium that makes me enthusiastic? Because because there is no between 0 and 1 in the computer world, there must be. Like the move 199. That might be the time when a computer gets life.

Reply via email to