On Friday 14 June 2013 18:13:27 Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Friday, 14 June 2013 16:45:38 CEST, Kevin Krammer wrote: > > Yeah, packagers don't like bundles libraries at all :) > > New external libraries are ok but of course additional > > effort so optional is > > helpful. > > What they have no problem with is library that are already > > packaged, which for > > Qt Keychains seems to be the case at least here on Debian. > > I'm unsure about QtKeychain -- it looks like a promising > project, but it became a part of e.g. Gentoo only 16 days > ago. We will also either have to maintain an OBS package or > ship it within the Trojita tree (with a switch to use the > systemwide copy if desired, of course) if it becomes a hard > dependency. On the other hand, it's wasteful to reimplement > it just for the sake of not requiring it. > > Opinions welcome -- my goal is to be able to: > > - provide OBS packaging of Trojita with reasonable level of > funcitonality for multiple systems (see the list of already > supported ones, some of them are ancient), - make it > reasonably easy to build Trojita by hand for users, - not > complicate matters too much to Trojita developers > > Cheers, > Jan
I think that QtKeychain is still young project, there could be packaging problems and my goal is to have kwallet support. So I think using stable kwallet library will be better for now. Kwallet code will be in separate plugin, which means it will be possible to create QtKeychain plugin later without problems. -- Pali Rohár [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
