On Wednesday 19 November 2014 12:40:53 Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Wednesday, 19 November 2014 11:59:13 CEST, Dimitrios Glentadakis wrote: > > Hi Jan, yes it would be good to have this, if there are > > patches available i could participate to test them > > The patches are at [1], [2] and [3] IIRC, but the key point is > that they definitely need at least rebasing, and perhaps also > some followup work in order to get them merged. I suppose > this is a job for someone who is willing to work on C++ code; > I'm not sure whether "just testing" the patches would help at > this point. > > Anyway, Pali, the original author, is aware of this; we'll see > if/when he has some time to work on them. I'm sure that he > wouldn't mind if somebody else did the work, too. > > With kind regards, > Jan > > [1] > http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones%2Ftrojita%2Fpali%2Ftrojita.g > it&a=shortlog&h=343766cbec93319470b483e286a1a8563c6a38b5 [2] > http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones%2Ftrojita%2Fpali%2Ftrojita.g > it&a=commitdiff&h=a5c94af79f0752588d17203d57452fd29f4ba0a1 [3] > http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones%2Ftrojita%2Fpali%2Ftrojita.g > it&a=commitdiff&h=132f8afe3ec45339be9e8ef261fcedde85145e15
Hello, now I'm at IPC patches and will send review request after I rebase & test patches... -- Pali Rohár [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
