*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Cchs are pretty to run solo as is op pro by dup

I'll take two trees that are next to each other and find differences  
and similarities between them and experience benifits

It's much like comparing a past scene to the present but both are in  
the present.

It goes flat like all cchs and op pro by dup process' do each session  
Then you run your timebreaking drills on levels 2 through 5


There is a benifit from just contacting a past scene or so called  
incident just by view

On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:58 AM, Jon Murray <[email protected]>  
wrote:

> *************
> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
> ************
> Isn't it dangerous to run goals briefing course style?
>
> According to Stephens, the opposers will always be wrong as they  
> aren't
> in the bank and have to be constructed into packages by the analytical
> mind (hence the goals packages of TROM).
>
> According to TROM you should never ask what opposes a goal or run any
> non life goals packages.
>
> Could the their auditing gains have come from running incidents rather
> than objectives?
>
> Apologies if I have misunderstood the post.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Jon
>
> On 09/11/2010 06:24, Ant Phillips wrote:
>> *************
>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>> ************
>> Dear TROMmers,
>>
>> Yes there is a whole Scientology world outside of TROM. What
>> "orthodox" TROMmers might call the "alternative" world.
>> I knew a married couple who co-audited Scientology objectives on each
>> other yearly, with good results.  (They were both Briefing Course
>> graduates, and "knew their onions")
>>
>> In the Scientology world, I was "forced" to take a "Dug Rundown" at
>> one point before they would allow me to go further. The only part of
>> it which gave me nice results was the objectives! I have also got
>> good results recently running incidents, Scientology style (parts of
>> R3X) on a friend recently - amazing results.
>>
>> There is a world outside of TROM. (valuable to those who have
>> overcome their ARC breaks with Scn and their false data on Scn)
>>
>> All best wishes,
>>
>> Ant
>>
>> PS  R.C. means Roman Catholic to me.
>>
>>
>> At 01:06 09-11-2010, Colleen Peltomaa wrote:
>>> I have had 3 years now of engram running using r3x, and I priorly
>>> received some CCHs in the Atlanta Church Org, to an EP, and I felt
>>> much more in present time as a result.
>>>
>>> It would never have occurred to me that I would need to re-do the
>>> CCH's.  However, upon R.C.'s insistence, he began delivering them to
>>> me anew.  Lo and behold they "bit" like they did not the first time
>>> years ago.  I would not have discovered for myself my need for them
>>> and might have a reason for why I am not feeling very successful
>>> running TROM consistently.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Trom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to