************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
> >> Cchs are pretty cool to run solo as is op pro by dup. Its not as easy as >> having an auditor help you along. >> >> I'll take two trees that are next to each other and find differences and >> similarities between them and experience benefits. Then run some RI and then >> move along right into a level five drill. >> >> Comparing two present time objects is much like comparing a past scene to >> the present but both are in the present. >> >> It goes flat like all cchs and op pro by dup process' do each session. Then >> you run RI and your timebreaking drills on levels 2 through 5 >> >> There is a benifit from just contacting a past scene or so called incident >> just by viewing the incident . But the real heart of the matter , the mass , >> is behind the effect in the goal, intension, purpose of the incident. Thats >> the purpose for time breaking the goals and not just the the effects of the >> goal. You time break effects on levels two three and four and not without >> great benefit , but the goals behind the effects you TB on level five are >> still left are need to be time-broken . There's nothing else there to >> timebreak after level four. Once you begin to time break goals, you'll truly >> see the benefit as it compares to just time breaking the effects in >> incidents. The release of charge from time breaking a goals package is >> incredible and powerful. Timebreaking effects on levels four and below has >> gone flat for me. I rarely if ever even see the effects of the goals i time >> break now . I only see the goals and the mass. I put the postulates up on >> level five and the mass presents itself for time breaking, and well.......... DAM, Is it a welcome site to see . The bigger and more difficult it is to time break the better the benefit and release . > > >> Yes it is dangerous to run briefing course style drills or any jr goals >> stuff . It's always best to stay with basic goals packages of " to know " . >> Not always the easiest but always the best. > >> >> On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:58 AM, Jon Murray <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ************* >>> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >>> ************ >>> Isn't it dangerous to run goals briefing course style? >>> >>> According to Stephens, the opposers will always be wrong as they aren't >>> in the bank and have to be constructed into packages by the analytical >>> mind (hence the goals packages of TROM). >>> >>> According to TROM you should never ask what opposes a goal or run any >>> non life goals packages. >>> >>> Could the their auditing gains have come from running incidents rather >>> than objectives? >>> >>> Apologies if I have misunderstood the post. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> On 09/11/2010 06:24, Ant Phillips wrote: >>>> ************* >>>> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >>>> ************ >>>> Dear TROMmers, >>>> >>>> Yes there is a whole Scientology world outside of TROM. What >>>> "orthodox" TROMmers might call the "alternative" world. >>>> I knew a married couple who co-audited Scientology objectives on each >>>> other yearly, with good results. (They were both Briefing Course >>>> graduates, and "knew their onions") >>>> >>>> In the Scientology world, I was "forced" to take a "Dug Rundown" at >>>> one point before they would allow me to go further. The only part of >>>> it which gave me nice results was the objectives! I have also got >>>> good results recently running incidents, Scientology style (parts of >>>> R3X) on a friend recently - amazing results. >>>> >>>> There is a world outside of TROM. (valuable to those who have >>>> overcome their ARC breaks with Scn and their false data on Scn) >>>> >>>> All best wishes, >>>> >>>> Ant >>>> >>>> PS R.C. means Roman Catholic to me. >>>> >>>> >>>> At 01:06 09-11-2010, Colleen Peltomaa wrote: >>>>> I have had 3 years now of engram running using r3x, and I priorly >>>>> received some CCHs in the Atlanta Church Org, to an EP, and I felt >>>>> much more in present time as a result. >>>>> >>>>> It would never have occurred to me that I would need to re-do the >>>>> CCH's. However, upon R.C.'s insistence, he began delivering them to >>>>> me anew. Lo and behold they "bit" like they did not the first time >>>>> years ago. I would not have discovered for myself my need for them >>>>> and might have a reason for why I am not feeling very successful >>>>> running TROM consistently. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Trom mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Trom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
