*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Hey guys,
 
I thought I'd add a few cents (or pence) to this discussion concerning study 
aids for TROM. 

Some sections of the TROM manual may be a bit hard to understand (at first) - 
I'm not going to deny that. 
And this is further compounded for those without a Scientology background. 

But, and this is a big "but", it is not the task or responsibility (or even the 
right) of this list to alter or rearrange the original manual in any way. I'm 
compelled to agree with Pete in this matter. 

The original text states, in the foreword: "It is of course each person’s 
responsibility to fully understand the text and apply it to themselves 
correctly. There is help and support provided on a list on the internet."

"It is each person's responsibility"...I think that says it all. 

Furthermore (in the section entitled 'Finale'): "When you duplicate the data, 
you duplicate it exactly. Not because I am enamored with my prose style, but 
because altered it could very easily become just another trap in a universe 
already abundantly endowed with them." 

I think it would be terribly, terribly WRONG to alter the manual in an attempt 
to 'simplify' it. It would also be wrong to tell people how to read it, what 
parts of it to read and it what order. Everytime you alter something, no matter 
how good your intentions may have been, you get into hot water. 

That being said, it can't hurt to put together a couple of study aids. Surely 
you all know that there are study aids for major works of literature. The 
student would refer to the study aid (e.g. CliffsNotes) to aid in the 
understanding of the primary text. You wouldn't just read the study aid without 
reading the original work. 

And so it might be a good idea to put together some study guide, glossary of 
terms or something like that. But such material MUST emphasise that they are 
merely "study aids" and that the original manual is the "primary source" and 
should be studied primarily. They should always encourage the reader to read 
the original manual, they should always direct him back to it, NOT AWAY FROM 
IT. 

In no case should the original manual itself be altered in ANY way.  

Anyway, these are my thoughts on the matter, and I thought I'd share them with 
you...

Harry


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> Sent: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:52:53 -0400
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [TROM1] needed TROM materials without 'Scientologese'
> 
> *************
> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
> ************
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

____________________________________________________________
Share photos & screenshots in seconds...
TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if1
Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks.
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to