************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Martin, Pete and others........ Re: Postulates and implants. You do not understand implants, nor have I met anyone else that understands implants. That includes Dennis ...........and LRH .....e.i. after LRH left Dianetics behind in the shadows. Implants are not necessarily done by some Marcabians or some other beings on the track prior to this life time. Nor is earth necessarily an implant station. In this case by implants I mean aberrating implants. There are non aberrating implants too. Anything that is taught that is positive and life enhancing can be considered an implant and is non aberrating and could even be un aberrating. There could be, in between lives implants and Marcabian implants, but if such datum is true, I have not experienced it yet. My evaluation has come to this: Implants are mainly done to us by many people, from parents, teachers, peers and media and what ever else. They consist of false and limiting data and suppressive data from the uneducated and the insufficiently educated and suppressive beings in our lives. We are PTS and aberrated primarily proportionately / relative to the number of and severity or degree of assholes, ignoramuses and suppressives in our lives. Conversely: We are successful relative to the degree of correctness of the data we are operating on. If we had all the correct operating data for every area of our lives we would be 100% successful in every area of our lives. The value of a datum is determined by the number of problems it solves, or in other words how well it works. con·verse 2 (kn-vûrs, knvûrs)adj. Reversed, as in position, order, or action; contrary.n. (knvûrs)1. Something that has been reversed; an opposite.2. Logic A proposition obtained by conversion. Conception via ungodly breeding practices are also a significant factor in cause of aberration. In other words we are a product of conception, genetics, and genetically inherited aberrations, and everything we sensed, ( experienced) even since prior to conception. We are all products of parents and environment. If you have a problem with a product, you have to check and evaluate the factory to find the cause. Also take note: Any datum is only as good as it has been evaluated. See what you look at and see honestly and evaluate honestly without preconceived ideas including Hubbards and Dennis's bullshit (implants) . Not seeing impartially, honestly and accurately is also a major factor in the cause of aberration. That is what "as- ising" really means to me. Call a spade a spade. See things for what they actually are. Dianetics describes implants the best and are the most real to me. That is pretty well all Dianetics deals with, is parental and this life implants. Scientology level implants to me, .... are at least...... more bull shit than not, till proven different. ( I have even come across some good data that says (convincingly explains how and why) that past lives are bullshit. (e.i. Past lives are a clever deception. Another trap in Scientology. ) (Note: I suspect Hubbard cleverly invented back track implants to divert attention of parents and other "this life" implanters), because he did not want PCs going around blaming parents ( and SPs ) for their problems and then this idea would spread into the professional psychology and psychiatry field and the media and the shit would hit the fan and all hell would break loose and come down heavier on Hubbard than they did already. Enough cat was let out of the bag already by the publication and wide spread sales of Dianetics, he realized this after the fact, so he had to do damage control and invent back track implants to hide Dianetics. Dianetics was all but left out of the picture on the bridge. Back track implants were also very much more profitable ( lucrative) for the business of auditing and bridge. ) Hubbard was aberrated , had huge case, but by no means stupid. Case history involving implants: I grew up in a very aberrated, dysfunctional family of seven children. Six boys and one girl, the girl being the youngest. Dad operated much, on the data of the bible to be fruitful and multiply. and to spare the rod is to spoil the child. Those were two of his most significant operating datums that he got from the bible for running a family. If some rod (meaning beatings) was good, more was better. I got the rod,......... enough to almost kill me. (This is an implant, or ...... beatings and abuse are implants,....... sex and all the aberrating gabbing and what not during conception and pregnancy are implants. That is the cause of abnormal sex drive or sex requirements and perversion. Read Dianetics to learn more. Most people hardly have a clue what is in Dianetics, if they do at all. ) I have never really fully recovered from the beatings I got. I was almost a zombie when I left home, so traumatized, I could hardly walk a straight line. When dad would shout and pound his fists, the house would shake and mom and us kids would tremble. He was pretty much constantly on mom's case too. Mom would sometimes go to the forest and sit on a rock and cry. Next; I am the oldest. The two of us oldest ones got the most rod. e.i. Beaten and suppressed past the breaking point or to the point of "no will or fight left" to fight back or fight anywhere. Boy number three got enough rod too, but being exceptionally clever, ( and maybe not beaten enough to the point of: past the point of no return, would get mad at dad, but could not fight back due to dad being bigger and sufficient altitude, authority and with suppressive postulates. So boy 3 took out his anger and frustration out in the line of least resistance, which was down the line. That meant ( mostly) on his younger brothers. A wrong target situation. He was ruthless and relentless. Boys number 4 and 5 were twins. But boy number 3 was close enough to boys number 4 and 5 that they were almost the same size as him, so there was sufficient resistance there that the fighting was not the most severe. Although plenty severe enough. One of the twins ( especially) got more than the other and suffers greatly till today. The other suffers enough too. Boy number three's method of taking his anger and frustration out , was suppressive name calling. e.i. Calling others stupid and retarded. Constant, relentless blocking, and invalidation. ........... Destroying self esteem and self confidence to no end. Ignorant meant someone not knowing something due to lack of education or experience meant being stupid and retarded .... to boy number three) Ignorant= stupid and retarded. He was practically constantly calling his younger brothers fucking stupid and ignorant and retarded and what ever else he could think of. Boy number six, being the youngest and small in comparison to boy number three, so boy number three really took out his anger and frustration on boy number six. Constantly calling him fucking stupid retard and ignorant stupid retard and what ever else. There was no end to it. It went on all pretty well all day and day out . 24/7/365 for the life time. Suppressing boy number six from as soon as he was old enough to be a target till today. . Boy number six did not have a chance. The name calling was so bad, that boy number six especially ,today is actually stupid and retarded. He was hammered and blocked in his every move from a very young age. He was made stupid and retarded. This has continued until today. Boy number six is now 48 and hardly more than a vegetable. He is mad at the world. The average person who meets him or has anything to do with him will describe him as stupid and retarded. His case consists of implants of various variations of: You are a fucking stupid ignorant retard. I remember a time when he was in his teens yet, where boy number six had still not become total effect of this name calling. I remember a time, where one day boy number six comes to boy number three and myself who were working in the shop fixing something. We lived and worked on a farm. Boy number six comes and sits on a block near us and says to us,....... particularly to boy number three, ( as I did not really suppress him much if any, I some how knew a bit better), ....he says " Boys, I am not stupid." This was aberratingly laughed off and turned into a joke by myself and boy number three. Note: I had to defend boy number three, to be on his side to work with him, because he was hard enough on me too. He was pretty much a natural clear. Now up to present time: The types of things he ( boy number six) does in life, the decisions he makes, ( of which there are countless horror stories,........e.i. head shaking stories) in our family and amongst neighbors) confirms this, to the uninformed or uneducated. So this is what implants really mean to me. Next: Games. The tech dictionary is a very poor dictionary, (many definitions are poorly described and not defined by Hubbard, but by staff and often far from accurate and far from absolute ) but being that it is all we have in Scientology,....... to try and understand Scientology, we have to carefully read the definition as it is and evaluate it against all other data in scn ( and even to all other data of comparable magnitude in the known universe) to come up with the most correct definition and broadest understanding of the words. And including taking an honest impartial, pan determined evaluation of the word, how it is used and what was the speaker actually trying to say or describe at the time. And Get all scn data ( scn programing) out of the way and take an honest look. Now: Look at the definition of games , and games conditions carefully. My edition of dictionary is up to 1981. In the def. of games conditions it is said mid way down: "There is nothing wrong with having games." The def. is evidently incomplete.This is the only clue that there are non aberrating games. Evidently by omission it does not go on to describing or defining what good games are or what non aberrating games are. Probably because the staff and all scientologists were / are fixated on "aberrating games". This def. can only mean that there are good games and bad games or non aberrating games and aberrating games. Ant and............ I think maybe someone else got into explaining this or trying to explain this too. In the broadest sense or definition any life activity can be called a game. You have to choose what kind of games you want to play. There are suppressive games which are very aberrating. Bank robbing is a game and is aberrating. So is beating up and robbing little old ladies. Business is a game. As long as you do business where there is fair exchange or a win win outcome, or balanced transaction, there is no aberration caused to any one. This is a non aberrating game. It can also be unaberrating. Giving (charity ) is a game, it is non aberrating, actually it is un aberrating, because it creates good outflow. As long as all your transactions and communications are all win win games, win win outcomes there is no aberration. They can be un aberrating. Games where everyone wins causes everyone to be happy or satisfied. Auditing can be called a game too, and it is unaberrating. So all games are not aberrating by any means. David > Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:17:41 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [TROM1] All games are aberative > > On 29/Feb/2012 17:18, David M. Pelly wrote: > > Or maybe it is true for you and Dennis, and some others, but it sure > > is not true for me. > > > Have a hard look at implant station Earth and those who decided to play > its games. > > Nice hearing from you David. > > Regards, > > Martin
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
