************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************ Hi!
The last letter I got (Trom Digest, Vol 93, Issue 13 – about how a practician of TROM perceives beautiful things) made me write my own letter with a bit of thoughts and a bit of questions I pose to gone-far-in-practice TROMers. I’m writing this letter and think that I have to say, that all the following are thoughts from my position – of being at level 2 only. So they are sort of thoughts that I made, not the pure truth. But I used logic, so they are likely to be logical . Let’s take a game of checkers as an example. As far as I know, this game has limited possibilities of how it (game of checkers) goes. Though I doubt it matters. As far as I get it, TROM gives enough tools for making you a master of this game. By that I mean the maximum level of skill – in every situation you know the best move to make. Btw, it means, that if 2 people of this maximum level of skill would play checkers against each other, they would always get DRAW result. Or, maybe, the one playing for white would always win. So, I have a question here. What are the exact steps that I must do (currently being at level 2 of TROM) to become a master of checkers? As far as I get it, completing levels 1 to 5 does not make you master of the game of checkers (maybe I’m mistaking – but if it would make you master of that game, why would there be level 6 (that anti-Bonding tech) ) ? Again, what do I do (which TROM techs exactly I use) to become a master of checkers? Btw, another question (though if I have correct perspective in a block of text above, the answer to this question would be YES). If a person, who only knows the rules of game checkers, and played this game, for example, only 10 times in his life (or 5 times in his life, or never, but knows the game rules), goes all the steps to become a master of that game, does he need any more EXPERIENCE in this game – or he will have all answers coming to him intuitively? Because, as far as I observed in life, those, who are closer to being master in some game – they are understanding more things from the experience they get. I mean, a person, which is closer to being a master, would improve his skill more from playing a same game (I mean an instance of game), than a person, who is not so close to being a master. So if he would be a master, he would not need to ever play this game – he would just be a perfect player in this game right after he understood the rules of game. Is it so? I can’t deny that I’m curious about becoming master or increasing closeness to being a master in some games. Coz it seems to be possible with TROM. Doesn’t it? Waiting for your answers and opinions. Cheers, Max P.S.: I seem to be having problems with receiving letters to my e-mail ([email protected]) (maybe someone besides me knows the password) so if someone would send any letter to my e-mail in future, to which I don’t reply, please resend it and write here that you did so (hope it’s not gonna spam the list too much). _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
