************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Begin forwarded message: > From: Pete McLaughlin <[email protected]> > Date: September 1, 2012 1:18:40 PM PDT > To: Beth Guest <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [IVy-subs-1] Genetic line > Reply-To: Pete McLaughlin <[email protected]> > > Is there some kind of bond because of genetics and if so what is it? > > Hi Beth > Two thing come to mind from your question. LRH said something about > contagion of aberration in his early books. It might have been DMSMH or > Science of Survival. > Dennis Stevens demonstrates that postulates can change the physical body in > this chapter from his research notes 03 Philosophy and levels 2, 3, and 5 of > TROM that is available at www.tromhelp.com/books > If this universe is composed only of life and postulates then postulates can > change the genetic inheritance of species. > > Sincerely > Pete > Thereby Hangs a Tale > > Ah thereby hangs a tale and we’ll have to tell you this tale so you’ll > understand this. This is the source of homosexuality in males and it’s a > great puzzle to every male, and I have got to the source of it. I do know > where it comes from and I’ll give you the data. Once you understand where it > comes from it will stop bothering you. > Now to understand it we have to go and look back to creatures living in the > wild. If you examine various creatures living in the wild in colonies > particularly herbivores, creatures like stags, kangaroos and so forth you’ll > find in their mating season there’s an enormous carnage of loss of young > males in fights. They get into fights. There’s a well known, you can read it > up in any… any book on zoology and you can go out into the wild and see these > deer’s fighting each other during the mating season. > What happens is that the mature male deer, he’s a big fella and he collects a > harem, he has his own harem of female deer and he guards them quite > possessively and young males grow up and as they grow up to be sexually > mature they cast envious eyes on his harem, you see. And all the time they’re > nosing around and trying to get a bit of sex from these female deer of his > harem, and, of course, he doesn’t care for this one little bit. So they end > up in fights and you find the stags fighting. > Well the fights are to the death amongst stags and amongst kangaroos. > Kangaroos got exactly the same mating habits and the fights are to the death > amongst the kangaroos too. And unfortunately the young stags stand no chance > against these big stags and they just simply get slaughtered. If they are not > slaughtered their maimed and go away to die in misery and the whole thing is > very, very wasteful of the young male breeding stock. And you might argue, of > course, well it’s nature reding tooth and claw, it’s survival of the fittest, > yes, yes but it’s still wasteful if it can be avoided. > You see a species survives best if it reserves it’s fighting for members > which aren’t of its own species. In other words, when a species starts to > fight amongst itself it’s an inefficient scene because its fighting its own > species, you see, it’s fighting itself. It does much better, it survives much > better, a species does, if it reserves it’s fighting for creatures that are > not of it’s own species. You understand me? > So when I say it’s wasteful, I mean exactly that, it’s very wasteful and the > stags and the kangaroo’s have never solved this problem, but the apes did. > They solved it. > Now the problem also exists among predator’s lions and tigers, they’ve got > similar mating habits. Now they’ve solved it too but there solution is quite > a different solution to the ape solution. So it doesn’t concern us. But other > creatures have solved the problem too. The stag’s never did solve it, the > kangaroo’s never solved it and to this day they still have this ritual annual > slaughter of these young males. But as I say the apes solved it and we’re > interested in that because the apes are mankind’s immediate ancestors. We’re > descended from the apes at a physical body level so we’re very interested in > the ape’s solution to that problem and it’s very, very relevant to this > subject of the feminine ionization on the rear end of the male human. > Now there’s no doubt that some millions and millions of years ago the ape too > suffered this carnage amongst their ape colonies and so forth, every year in > the mating season the young adolescent apes would come up and there’d be the > big ape there with his harem and the young adolescent would be driven by his > sexual urges to fight the big fella and he would almost invariably lose, he > would lose and carnage would occur. But the apes, possibly because the apes > were a little bit smarter than many other animals, but the apes came up with > a solution to it. And their solution worked. > We can imagine a hypothetical scene, that one day some young adolescent ape > was fighting to the death with some large ape who owned the harem and it had > got to the point where he realized that he was being slaughtered and if the > fight continued as he had to go on fighting, he was going to get killed. So > he, in desperation, said to himself, “Well what the hell, is there any way I > can prevent myself from getting killed here? This big fella’s going to kill > me and he’s not going to relent until he’s killed me. I can’t do anything > about it.” > So in final desperation he suddenly remembered, this young adolescent ape had > watched the female apes and he realized that the male ape, the dominant male > ape, could always be appeased by a female ape. This is true in the ape > kingdom, the female ape can always appease the angry male ape by presenting > her rump to him. Soon as she presented her rump to him, he mounts her > sexually, makes a few pelvic thrusts and umm… dismounts and honour is > satisfied, you might say, and he goes his way, and she goes her way. > And this adolescent ape millions and millions of years ago fighting the big > ape he must have realized this, the big ape he was the owner of the harem. > The adolescent must have spotted this in desperation to save his own life he > offered his own rump to the male ape, and the male ape, of course, once a > rump is offered to him he immediately assumes that this must be a female he’s > fighting so he did his thing his native conditioning would cause him to do. > He simply mounted the adolescent male ape made a few pelvic thrusts > dismounted and went his way. > We can presume that the adolescent male ape, he must have breathed a sigh of > relief, he saved his life and more importantly his solution worked so next > time he came along to the harem he knew how to save his life. He had > experience, he had experiential factor here of knowing how to solve the > problem. He could fight to the point where he was losing the battle then he > knew that he could always end the fight by acting as a female, acting up as a > female. > And so he no doubt used this mechanism there. But other eyes were watching > him, lots and lots of other apes were watching. As in any other animal > colony, there’s lots and lots of youngsters who watch the fights with great > interest. It’s of great significance to them these fights are and lots and > lots of young male apes must have been watching this adolescent ape when he > presented his rump and they learnt too, and they spotted it so when their > turn came to try and become the leader of the tribe and take on the big > fella, they learnt how to save their life too. And , because apes are pretty > smart, their pretty quick learners, you know, for things like that. And so it > got into their culture and it spread. > Now why would it spread through the ape colony, through the ape culture? Well > simply because those who practiced it, those who practiced this system > survived. The adolescent ape who practiced this system survived and the > adolescent ape who practiced it, he eventually would grow up and become a > fully mature male ape and would go off and get a harem of his own. If he > didn’t practice this system there’s a good 80% chance that he’d get > slaughtered and he would never survive and his genes would never be passed on > to posterity. So the ones that adopted this system had their genes passed on > to posterity, the ones who didn’t, didn’t have their genes passed on. > So after a few hundreds of generations, a few thousands of generations of > apes you would expect to find by pure Darwinian evolution that all the apes > in the colonies in the area it would all be practicing this same system, this > solution to the problem of how to stop the carnage. > Now the solution not only is a good solution, you might say, “Well it’s a > good solution for the adolescent male ape but how does it benefit the big > fellow, does it help him?” Yes, it does, as a matter of fact, it’s a good > solution for him cause look, as soon as the adolescent ape whose fighting him > for dominance quits the fight and offers his rump and the big fellow mounts > him, once the adolescent ape quits the fight and offers his rump he’s gone > into the female universe and he’s offering his rump up with a “must be sexed” > postulate on it, but he’s become feminine. And while the adolescent ape is in > the feminine universe he can’t be in the masculine universe because of the > double bind. Follow? > So as far as the big fellow is concerned he can keep all the adolescent apes > in the community in the feminine valence, if he can keep them in the feminine > valence their not in the masculine valence, or , let’s not use valence we’ll > use universe, while there in the feminine universe their not in the masculine > universe and if there not in the masculine universe there not interested in > his female harem. They leave his females alone. You see? > So it does benefit him too. So it benefits both of them. The young apes get > benefited, it saves their lives, the older ape gets benefited that it stops > these youngsters pestering his flock all the time he just has to assert his > authority once or twice, they use the mechanism and after that the ionization > is there and that’s it. > Then he can leave them amongst his females, they won’t interfere while there > in the feminine valence and their likely to stay in the feminine universe > while he’s present and as he never strays very far away from his harem, just > his presence keeps these adolescents in the feminine universe, keeps them out > of their masculine universe. So it works for all parties concerned, you see. > And it’s purely a male thing, it’s got nothing to do with the females, I > mean, the reason that the female ape gets her rump and her rectum ionized > with a “must be sexed” postulate is because of the close proximity of these > body parts to her vulva and her vagina. > In fact in sexual play with apes she almost certainly gets her rectum entered > many, many, many times by sheer accident and so you quite expect the female > ape would have a positive “must be sexed” ionization on her rump and on … on > her rectum. It would be quite natural for this to be. So it doesn’t concern > the female at all. > In other words she always did know how to appease the male, she simply > presented her rump to him. It was the young males who had to learn how to do > it to save their lives. You see, and they did learn, and most importantly for > our purposes, the purposes of the human being, is that we are related to > them. And we are the descendents of those apes and we have the same > physiological ionization. > You see it wasn’t long for these apes before they were being born with this > ionization. It can happen by genetics, that all the males eventually in the > colony by usage and by games play would end up with a “must be sexed” > ionization, and well, that could only go on for a few thousand years, after > that they’d be born with a positive ionization, it’s the way the body is. You > know. > And you can find out about this in any book on evolutionary theory but by > simple usage the body adapts to it eventually and so we would expect the apes > would be born with a positive “must be sexed” on their rumps and rectums, > male apes, would be born. And the human beings, of course, today male human > beings are the same, they are just born with it, born with that ionization. > Now the problem is, although this mechanism is of tremendous survival value > to the apes in their colonies, in their wild life the ionization on the rump, > the feminine ionization on the rump and rectum on the male is of no earthly > use in our society, you see that. The things just a complete nuisance and > because nobody knows where it comes from, you can’t look up in a book > anywhere and find out about it cause all these sexual postulates are a > mystery, nobody knows about ionization of body parts because they’re not > aware of them, it’s just a complete… the whole things just a complete mystery. > We have a vast number of human males wandering around the planet believing > there homosexual because they’re aware of this positive ionization on their > rear end, the positive feminine ionization. The thing becomes a psychological > nightmare. > Just as the female tends to dissociate from the front of her body we find the > male tends to dissociate from the rear of his body. His masculine identity > tends to be at the front of his body associated with his penis and testicles > and this bit behind him he comes to dissociate himself from. He can’t be both > in the class of “to sex” and in the class of “to be sexed” the double bind > says so. He can’t do it, so he has to dissociate. If he’s in the class of > self and the self is in the class of “must sex” then the “must be sexed” > component on his rear end must be in the class of not self. There’s the > dissociation. > Now we have the perfect dissociation and this is what happens with the male, > and the male easily goes into homosexuality. Similarly with the female, she > can dissociate from the masculine ionization on the clitoris and easily go > into lesbianism, which is just as great a mystery to the female as > homosexuality is to the males. > So by examining this subject of ionization we have an immediate solution to > two of the greatest sexual problems that have always been with human beings, > the subjects of lesbianism and homosexuality, we see where it comes from. > Now, you might say, if this is so, how come that the zoologists haven’t > spotted it? I mean they have been studying these apes intensively for the > last 50 years and for the last 100, 150 years casually. Why haven’t they > spotted it? > Well, of course they’re aware of the mating habits of the ape. They know all > about the male apes turning the rump to the dominant male who owns the harem. > They know all about it, it’s written up in all the zoology books. But what > they don’t know about, and what we know about, is the four sexual postulates > of the “to sex” goals package. And we also know about this subject of body > ionization, the ionization of body parts, that the zoologists don’t know > anything about so they cannot correlate the subject of the mating habits of > the ape, they cannot correlate that with homosexuality in the male. Follow? > There’s simply no way they can do it because the missing links in the chain > are the postulates of the “to sex” goals package and the whole subject of the > sexual ionization of human body parts. Once you know of the ionization of the > body parts it sticks out like a sore thumb. It’s obvious why; it’s obvious > where he gets his feminine ionization of his rump from. And it’s equally > obvious that he isn’t going to erase it in therapy, it’s a genetic thing, > it’s quite natural. > >
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
