*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Hi Martin
Dennis defines ionization in one of the supplemental lectures as the electrical
charging as you get when you run a high voltage current through a glass tube
filled with neon to produce light. he calls these strip lights.
He also says that any mass can be charged up by putting a postulate in it so
charging body parts or clothes with to sex or to be sexed posulates would cause
them to be ionized with these postulates.
Keep on TROMing
Pete
On Sep 2, 2012, at 11:02 AM, "Martin Foster" <[email protected]> wrote:
> *************
> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
> ************
> I loved the excerpt Pete – only one puzzlement! Did Dennis use the word
> “ionization” or was it association, identification or ideation? I haven’t
> got a definition of ionization which fits the context.
> What tape was it on?
> Regards,
>
> Martin
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Pete Mclaughlin
> Sent: 02 September 2012 09:08
> To: TROM
> Subject: [TROM1] Fwd: [IVy-subs-1] Genetic line
>
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Pete McLaughlin <[email protected]>
>> Date: September 1, 2012 1:18:40 PM PDT
>> To: Beth Guest <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [IVy-subs-1] Genetic line
>> Reply-To: Pete McLaughlin <[email protected]>
>>
>> Is there some kind of bond because of genetics and if so what is it?
>>
>> Hi Beth
>> Two thing come to mind from your question. LRH said something about
>> contagion of aberration in his early books. It might have been DMSMH or
>> Science of Survival.
>> Dennis Stevens demonstrates that postulates can change the physical body in
>> this chapter from his research notes 03 Philosophy and levels 2, 3, and 5 of
>> TROM that is available at www.tromhelp.com/books
>> If this universe is composed only of life and postulates then postulates can
>> change the genetic inheritance of species.
>>
>> Sincerely
>> Pete
>> Thereby Hangs a Tale
>>
>> Ah thereby hangs a tale and webll have to tell you this tale so youbll
>> understand this. This is the source of homosexuality in males and itbs a
>> great puzzle to every male, and I have got to the source of it. I do know
>> where it comes from and Ibll give you the data. Once you understand where it
>> comes from it will stop bothering you.
>> Now to understand it we have to go and look back to creatures living in the
>> wild. If you examine various creatures living in the wild in colonies
>> particularly herbivores, creatures like stags, kangaroos and so forth youbll
>> find in their mating season therebs an enormous carnage of loss of young
>> males in fights. They get into fights. Therebs a well known, you can read it
>> up in anyb& any book on zoology and you can go out into the wild and see
>> these deerbs fighting each other during the mating season.
>> What happens is that the mature male deer, hebs a big fella and he collects
>> a harem, he has his own harem of female deer and he guards them quite
>> possessively and young males grow up and as they grow up to be sexually
>> mature they cast envious eyes on his harem, you see. And all the time
>> theybre nosing around and trying to get a bit of sex from these female deer
>> of his harem, and, of course, he doesnbt care for this one little bit. So
>> they end up in fights and you find the stags fighting.
>> Well the fights are to the death amongst stags and amongst kangaroos.
>> Kangaroos got exactly the same mating habits and the fights are to the death
>> amongst the kangaroos too. And unfortunately the young stags stand no chance
>> against these big stags and they just simply get slaughtered. If they are
>> not slaughtered their maimed and go away to die in misery and the whole
>> thing is very, very wasteful of the young male breeding stock. And you might
>> argue, of course, well itbs nature reding tooth and claw, itbs survival of
>> the fittest, yes, yes but itbs still wasteful if it can be avoided.
>> You see a species survives best if it reserves itbs fighting for members
>> which arenbt of its own species. In other words, when a species starts to
>> fight amongst itself itbs an inefficient scene because its fighting its own
>> species, you see, itbs fighting itself. It does much better, it survives
>> much better, a species does, if it reserves itbs fighting for creatures that
>> are not of itbs own species. You understand me?
>> So when I say itbs wasteful, I mean exactly that, itbs very wasteful and the
>> stags and the kangaroobs have never solved this problem, but the apes did.
>> They solved it.
>> Now the problem also exists among predatorbs lions and tigers, theybve got
>> similar mating habits. Now theybve solved it too but there solution is quite
>> a different solution to the ape solution. So it doesnbt concern us. But
>> other creatures have solved the problem too. The stagbs never did solve it,
>> the kangaroobs never solved it and to this day they still have this ritual
>> annual slaughter of these young males. But as I say the apes solved it and
>> webre interested in that because the apes are mankindbs immediate ancestors.
>> Webre descended from the apes at a physical body level so webre very
>> interested in the apebs solution to that problem and itbs very, very
>> relevant to this subject of the feminine ionization on the rear end of the
>> male human.
>> Now therebs no doubt that some millions and millions of years ago the ape
>> too suffered this carnage amongst their ape colonies and so forth, every
>> year in the mating season the young adolescent apes would come up and
>> therebd be the big ape there with his harem and the young adolescent would
>> be driven by his sexual urges to fight the big fella and he would almost
>> invariably lose, he would lose and carnage would occur. But the apes,
>> possibly because the apes were a little bit smarter than many other animals,
>> but the apes came up with a solution to it. And their solution worked.
>> We can imagine a hypothetical scene, that one day some young adolescent ape
>> was fighting to the death with some large ape who owned the harem and it had
>> got to the point where he realized that he was being slaughtered and if the
>> fight continued as he had to go on fighting, he was going to get killed. So
>> he, in desperation, said to himself, b Well what the hell, is there any way
>> I can prevent myself from getting killed here? This big fellabs going to
>> kill me and hebs not going to relent until hebs killed me. I canbt do
>> anything about it.b
>> So in final desperation he suddenly remembered, this young adolescent ape
>> had watched the female apes and he realized that the male ape, the dominant
>> male ape, could always be appeased by a female ape. This is true in the ape
>> kingdom, the female ape can always appease the angry male ape by presenting
>> her rump to him. Soon as she presented her rump to him, he mounts her
>> sexually, makes a few pelvic thrusts and ummb& dismounts and honour is
>> satisfied, you might say, and he goes his way, and she goes her way.
>> And this adolescent ape millions and millions of years ago fighting the big
>> ape he must have realized this, the big ape he was the owner of the harem.
>> The adolescent must have spotted this in desperation to save his own life he
>> offered his own rump to the male ape, and the male ape, of course, once a
>> rump is offered to him he immediately assumes that this must be a female
>> hebs fighting so he did his thing his native conditioning would cause him to
>> do. He simply mounted the adolescent male ape made a few pelvic thrusts
>> dismounted and went his way.
>> We can presume that the adolescent male ape, he must have breathed a sigh of
>> relief, he saved his life and more importantly his solution worked so next
>> time he came along to the harem he knew how to save his life. He had
>> experience, he had experiential factor here of knowing how to solve the
>> problem. He could fight to the point where he was losing the battle then he
>> knew that he could always end the fight by acting as a female, acting up as
>> a female.
>> And so he no doubt used this mechanism there. But other eyes were watching
>> him, lots and lots of other apes were watching. As in any other animal
>> colony, therebs lots and lots of youngsters who watch the fights with great
>> interest. Itbs of great significance to them these fights are and lots and
>> lots of young male apes must have been watching this adolescent ape when he
>> presented his rump and they learnt too, and they spotted it so when their
>> turn came to try and become the leader of the tribe and take on the big
>> fella, they learnt how to save their life too. And , because apes are pretty
>> smart, their pretty quick learners, you know, for things like that. And so
>> it got into their culture and it spread.
>> Now why would it spread through the ape colony, through the ape culture?
>> Well simply because those who practiced it, those who practiced this system
>> survived. The adolescent ape who practiced this system survived and the
>> adolescent ape who practiced it, he eventually would grow up and become a
>> fully mature male ape and would go off and get a harem of his own. If he
>> didnbt practice this system therebs a good 80% chance that hebd get
>> slaughtered and he would never survive and his genes would never be passed
>> on to posterity. So the ones that adopted this system had their genes passed
>> on to posterity, the ones who didnbt, didnbt have their genes passed on.
>> So after a few hundreds of generations, a few thousands of generations of
>> apes you would expect to find by pure Darwinian evolution that all the apes
>> in the colonies in the area it would all be practicing this same system,
>> this solution to the problem of how to stop the carnage.
>> Now the solution not only is a good solution, you might say, b Well itbs a
>> good solution for the adolescent male ape but how does it benefit the big
>> fellow, does it help him?b Yes, it does, as a matter of fact, itbs a good
>> solution for him cause look, as soon as the adolescent ape whose fighting
>> him for dominance quits the fight and offers his rump and the big fellow
>> mounts him, once the adolescent ape quits the fight and offers his rump hebs
>> gone into the female universe and hebs offering his rump up with a b must be
>> sexedb postulate on it, but hebs become feminine. And while the adolescent
>> ape is in the feminine universe he canbt be in the masculine universe
>> because of the double bind. Follow?
>> So as far as the big fellow is concerned he can keep all the adolescent apes
>> in the community in the feminine valence, if he can keep them in the
>> feminine valence their not in the masculine valence, or , letbs not use
>> valence webll use universe, while there in the feminine universe their not
>> in the masculine universe and if there not in the masculine universe there
>> not interested in his female harem. They leave his females alone. You see?
>> So it does benefit him too. So it benefits both of them. The young apes get
>> benefited, it saves their lives, the older ape gets benefited that it stops
>> these youngsters pestering his flock all the time he just has to assert his
>> authority once or twice, they use the mechanism and after that the
>> ionization is there and thatbs it.
>> Then he can leave them amongst his females, they wonbt interfere while there
>> in the feminine valence and their likely to stay in the feminine universe
>> while hebs present and as he never strays very far away from his harem, just
>> his presence keeps these adolescents in the feminine universe, keeps them
>> out of their masculine universe. So it works for all parties concerned, you
>> see.
>> And itbs purely a male thing, itbs got nothing to do with the females, I
>> mean, the reason that the female ape gets her rump and her rectum ionized
>> with a b must be sexedb postulate is because of the close proximity of these
>> body parts to her vulva and her vagina.
>> In fact in sexual play with apes she almost certainly gets her rectum
>> entered many, many, many times by sheer accident and so you quite expect the
>> female ape would have a positive b must be sexedb ionization on her rump and
>> on b& on her rectum. It would be quite natural for this to be. So it doesnbt
>> concern the female at all.
>> In other words she always did know how to appease the male, she simply
>> presented her rump to him. It was the young males who had to learn how to do
>> it to save their lives. You see, and they did learn, and most importantly
>> for our purposes, the purposes of the human being, is that we are related to
>> them. And we are the descendents of those apes and we have the same
>> physiological ionization.
>> You see it wasnbt long for these apes before they were being born with this
>> ionization. It can happen by genetics, that all the males eventually in the
>> colony by usage and by games play would end up with a b must be sexedb
>> ionization, and well, that could only go on for a few thousand years, after
>> that theybd be born with a positive ionization, itbs the way the body is.
>> You know.
>> And you can find out about this in any book on evolutionary theory but by
>> simple usage the body adapts to it eventually and so we would expect the
>> apes would be born with a positive b must be sexedb on their rumps and
>> rectums, male apes, would be born. And the human beings, of course, today
>> male human beings are the same, they are just born with it, born with that
>> ionization.
>> Now the problem is, although this mechanism is of tremendous survival value
>> to the apes in their colonies, in their wild life the ionization on the
>> rump, the feminine ionization on the rump and rectum on the male is of no
>> earthly use in our society, you see that. The things just a complete
>> nuisance and because nobody knows where it comes from, you canbt look up in
>> a book anywhere and find out about it cause all these sexual postulates are
>> a mystery, nobody knows about ionization of body parts because theybre not
>> aware of them, itbs just a completeb& the whole things just a complete
>> mystery.
>> We have a vast number of human males wandering around the planet believing
>> there homosexual because theybre aware of this positive ionization on their
>> rear end, the positive feminine ionization. The thing becomes a
>> psychological nightmare.
>> Just as the female tends to dissociate from the front of her body we find
>> the male tends to dissociate from the rear of his body. His masculine
>> identity tends to be at the front of his body associated with his penis and
>> testicles and this bit behind him he comes to dissociate himself from. He
>> canbt be both in the class of b to sexb and in the class of b to be sexedb
>> the double bind says so. He canbt do it, so he has to dissociate. If hebs in
>> the class of self and the self is in the class of b must sexb then the
>> b must be sexedb component on his rear end must be in the class of not self.
>> Therebs the dissociation.
>> Now we have the perfect dissociation and this is what happens with the male,
>> and the male easily goes into homosexuality. Similarly with the female, she
>> can dissociate from the masculine ionization on the clitoris and easily go
>> into lesbianism, which is just as great a mystery to the female as
>> homosexuality is to the males.
>> So by examining this subject of ionization we have an immediate solution to
>> two of the greatest sexual problems that have always been with human beings,
>> the subjects of lesbianism and homosexuality, we see where it comes from.
>> Now, you might say, if this is so, how come that the zoologists havenbt
>> spotted it? I mean they have been studying these apes intensively for the
>> last 50 years and for the last 100, 150 years casually. Why havenbt they
>> spotted it?
>> Well, of course theybre aware of the mating habits of the ape. They know all
>> about the male apes turning the rump to the dominant male who owns the
>> harem. They know all about it, itbs written up in all the zoology books. But
>> what they donbt know about, and what we know about, is the four sexual
>> postulates of the b to sexb goals package. And we also know about this
>> subject of body ionization, the ionization of body parts, that the
>> zoologists donbt know anything about so they cannot correlate the subject of
>> the mating habits of the ape, they cannot correlate that with homosexuality
>> in the male. Follow?
>> Therebs simply no way they can do it because the missing links in the chain
>> are the postulates of the b to sexb goals package and the whole subject of
>> the sexual ionization of human body parts. Once you know of the ionization
>> of the body parts it sticks out like a sore thumb. Itbs obvious why; itbs
>> obvious where he gets his feminine ionization of his rump from. And itbs
>> equally obvious that he isnbt going to erase it in therapy, itbs a genetic
>> thing, itbs quite natural.
>>
>>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5241 - Release Date: 09/01/12
> =
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
