************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
Hi Paul, Aarre
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Paul Tipon <pti...@proftitleserv.com>wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org > ************ > Hi Glen, > > Very well put. I couldn't agree more. > > Paul, Level 5 in progress > > On Feb 5, 2013, at 8:05 AM, trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org wrote: > >> >> Even if one assumes that there was one absolutely right way to heal or >> reach enlightenment. And that Dennis had worked this out perfectly, in a >> way that would work the same way for every human being. And that he >> expressed his ideas in the clearest, most easily >> understandable way. And that the editors did the best possible job of >> presenting this material. >> >> (All of which are highly doubtful assumptions in any subject or written >> document.) >> >> You will always be left with the fact that every human being will always >> interpret and understand the material in a slightly different way. >> What's more, one cannot own the material without developing one's unique >> understanding of it, an understanding that either works for them or >> doesn't. No truly literal duplication of anything exists and if it did, it >> would be a mental straightjacket (IMHO). >> >> Don't believe me? Look at how many thousands if not millions of >> interpretations there are of any religious scripture like the Bible or >> the Buddhist doctrines. Everything evolves. And, just like every >> Christian today picks and chooses bits of the Bible that support their >> personal ideas and rejects the rest, TROM will also have to evolve with >> some flexibility or wither. > > > ' I thought about this exactly the same way over a year ago, and also >> observed that; I still think that the original document should be as >> close to original source as possible, and then simpler (average guy) >> editions could exist also, as long as their authorship/source is stated >> bluntly in the beginning. Then individuals could slightly adjust the data >> as you stated in their application. This slight alteration insures the >> perpetuation of the work; According to LRH, to persist, there must be a >> slight alteration. A total duplication (AS - ISness) would theoretically >> cause a vanishment. The original document should be pristine however, so >> that wanderers could always come back to 'more' puritanical application >> when needed and wanted. Perhaps, allowing a slight alteration in >> application to fit more complementarily with each individual's postulate >> set quirks would allow the techniques to persist through time for a long, >> long, time.' Aarre Peltomaa >> p.s. does this sound correct at all ? > > > > > >> So, it's worth preserving Dennis's original intent. But that may not be >> the best presentation to reach and help the most people. Many people, >> especially those who haven't studied Scientology (and fewer people do all >> the time) would find the TROM materials that currently exist to be >> gobbledygook. The person who can find a way to express them in a way that >> is clear and appealing to the average person will take this material a big >> step forward. >> >> (And maybe the person who subjects them to rigorous double-blind testing >> to see how well they actually work for most people will perform the biggest >> service of all.) >> > ______________________________**_________________ > Trom mailing list > Trom@lists.newciv.org > http://lists.newciv.org/**mailman/listinfo/trom<http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom> >
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
