************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi David Thanks for the introduction. I have removed the moderate flag from your email address.
Your note http://adarsajnana.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/sensory-overload-and-unimportances/ was an interesting read. Dennis derived TROM from Scientology, of course, but I hadn't seen the reference to an unimportance a process before. My personal experience after studying Scientology, Buddhism, Sedona Method, TROM and lately "Busting Loose From the Money Game" is that all of these therapies address the same problem of the mind in similar fashion. The words used to call up an incident are less important than how thoroughly you re-experience the past scene and reduce it's importance to you. The thing I found most important in TROM was that it is an entirely self guided therapy. I am a problematic PC because I get into games conditions with the auditor. I can't do that with TROM. Hope you find TROM helpful. Keep on TROMing Pete List Moderator On Oct 12, 2013, at 2:55 PM, [email protected] wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > Hello, > > I'm David Cooke from Adelaide, Australia. I've had an interest in > scientology (in the broadest sense of the word, and with a lowercase "s") > for most of this lifetime, and came upon TROM a few months ago in the course > of reading everything I could find about the continuation of the research > that LRH began into actual GPMs, games and goals packages. Two things stood > out about Dennis Stephens' work: > > 1) Timebreaking. I've experienced this way of thinking at least since going > clear 40 years ago but never had a word for it or a conceptual framework to > explain it. In place of small, solid, apparently other-determined, > facsimiles the past was contactable as life-sized scenes that I was free to > enter. I had been theorizing about present time being broadened to include > more and more of the past; but Stephens' Supermarket Paradox expresses this > much more elegantly. > > 2) Stephens' four-leg model of games, and Know as the basic game, immediately > made sense. They explain so much, and have the great virtue of simplicity. > Mathematics was not one of LRH's strong points, and the use of Boolean > algebra may have been the additional thing that was needed. > > I'm currently on Level 3 of TROM. > > Many thanks to Pete for maintaining this List, and to all who have been > keeping Dennis Stephens' work available and in use. BTW... around 1997 I was > quite outspoken on Usenet in defence (as I then misconceived it) of > scientology against freezoners and others. If anyone whom I offended at that > time is reading this, I acknowledge that you were right and I was in the > wrong. > > Regards, > > David > > [email protected] > > www.adarsajnana.wordpress.com > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
