************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi David Since you asked.
I raised 4 daughters. When babies want a bottle or a change they get very loud and demanding. It is definitely a forced to know. Dennis is quite clear that a being enters game play at must be known and his last failure is at must not know. Therefor the correct way to take the mind apart is in reverse order. In a particular case in the middle of the process of taking a mind apart the PC may need to work on various legs of the postulate failure chart as time goes on. The leg that he needs to work on now will be the one that is most real to him now. Keep on TROMing Pete Sent from my iPad > On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:21 PM, David Pelly <[email protected]> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > > I was just starting a session of L4. > > And was going to start at 1 and go to 8 like the book says. > > So I take my sheet and read: > > 1. Forced to know. (Infliction) (Motivator) > > This category is about infliction. “Forced to know” means instances or > incidents where someone inflicted something on you, (against your will) with > enough force to overwhelm you, upset you, or frustrate you, or to break your > spirit. They consist of issues or incidents like conflict, abuse, > invalidation, and suppression. > > > And it does not make sense, when compared against #8. > > > > 8. Forcing to know(Infliction) (Overt) > > This category is about infliction. “Forcing to know” means instances or > incidents where you inflicted something on someone, (against their will) with > enough force to overwhelm them, to to frustrate them, or break their spirit. > This is an overt act. In other words a harmful act. > > > > The question is:..... if #8 is supposed to be the beginning of my track, > (that is this life) how can I as a baby or small child; "force someone to > know" : that is me commit an overt, by me inflicting someone to overwhelm him? > > It does not make sense to me. > > It makes sense that #8 is an overt act of infliction to overwhelm someone > that I committed in present time. > And it makes sense that #1 is an overt act of infliction committed against > me as a child. > > If I am wrong, can someone please explain why Dennis is right? > > I look forward to your soonest response. > > David > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
