************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi David,
Thank you for your input. Reply interspersed: > Hi David > > My thoughts, important only to me: > > Seems that if our unconscious(forgotten) postulates are creating our > games(problems) and we get to playing games compulsively, > Me> Yes, I understand. > then none of this 'new age' positive thinking stuff comes into the > picture. It is just a distraction. For most of us this just forces more > crap into a mind that already has too many overwhelms > Me> Yes, I understand what is going on in new age thinking very well, re adding layers. I did not imply that I was into new age stuff and adding new age stuff to TROM. I was into some new age stuff in the 70s, 80s and 90s. I could not find any answers in new age stuff, so I actually gave up looking. Until I learned about Dianetics from a TV commercial in 97. Then I began to understand what is wrong with the mind. > and these affirmations cannot stick when they hit a forgotten > counter-postulate. > Me> Yes. I know that well. My point for bringing up "affirmations" was for using an idea or practice of comparable magnitude. That is part of or in alignment with the formula for understanding. > Get rid of the counter-postulate and you do not need the affirmations at > all. > Me> Well than what is the purpose of RIs then? The problem with most 'new age' remedies is that they keep 'adding' stuff, > while we want to be 'removing' stuff so we can get to a non-compulsive > games condition. > Me> Again you are continuing to misunderstand me, and take what I said out of context. . > I wonder if is part of the reason so many eventually find out that > 'letting go' brings the greatest results. > Me> "Letting go" as meant in new age thought, has not worked for me. > > For me, I will keep on 'removing' stuff so I can get to what is under the > shit. II will just keep on using Trom for now. > > This is just me trying to make sense of why my enthusiasm for positive > thinking remedies keeps waning . > Me> Again, you are over running the new age idea. If the idea that there are only two things in this universe is true; that is life and postulates, then you need to "place in" some postulates on top of or into "life" somewhere, in order to make life work. And it is my thinking that is the whole idea behind RIs. RIs are meant to replace the removed "undesirable postulates" that have been removed. And it is my thinking that the idea of affirmations are pretty much the same idea. Regards, David Regards > Dave > > On 27/01/2014 11:34, [email protected] wrote: > > Send Trom mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Trom digest..." > > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. More on RIs/ affirmations: (David Pelly) > 2. Dream universe (Slim .) > 3. Re: Defining RIs (Paul Tipon) > 4. Re: The Ultimaticity of Importances (Teresa Smart) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing > [email protected]http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > > > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > >
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
