************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************ I'd just clarify that a postulate is not a statement. Thinking that postulates are some verbalization is not correct. A postulate of gold bars IS the gold bars, the postulate IS the thing itself. Existence is not brought about by a via of making a statement about existence.
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Tipon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [TROM1] Too much attention on postulates from the past A postulate is a postulate. A positive postulate is positive and the simplest example is, (blank) will be this and so and so. This postulate can be positive at its inception yet in the future it may not fit the circumstances and thereby then be a negative or counter postulate. The same is true for an 'in the beginning' negative postulate as time progresses. So how does one not booby trap themselves with negative and positive postulates? How can one tell whether or not a postulate will wrongly apply at some future time in totally different circumstances. Well unless you can foretell the future for every postulate you and anyone else ever made, you can't. Boy does this ever sound like a booby trapped loosing game, huh. Well if you want it to be ... it sure is. Then too even if you don't want it to be, it sure is or is that 'is not'. For one cannot foretell the future of any and all postulates made by you and everyone else across all of time. Now let's go back and look into what a postulate really is. A postulate is a statement that brings an is-ness into existence. So a statement of an is-ness is a postulate. And, an as-isness is a postulate that states a truth if one has made a true statement of as- isness. Such a statement also has the power to as-is and if done thoroughly has the power to vanish the is-ness. Now all this brings into this discussion alter-isness and not- isness. Alter-isness is a postulate that changes something, a postulate into something else, an altered-isness or an altered postulate. Damn! There we go! Postulates can be altered. But what about that last remaining one, not-isness. Well a not is-ness is a postulate counter to a postulate and it sets up a force/counter force. It does not is-ness it, as-is it or alter- isness it and certainly doesn't as-isness it. Darn! I guess we would have to call this a ridge. Interesting thing about this ridge is that it is timeless for the force/counter force are locked, one against the other and remain that way regardless of time. These ridges are then energy against energy and they go nowhere with respect to each other and therefore no motion means that no time passes for these two forces because there is no motion between them for the space that they occupy. Matter is a special example of this. Oh, that means that is-ness, as-isness and alter-isness can change this force/counter force arrangement. Hmmmmmmmm! So postulates are altered, vanished or new postulates put in at any time in the future can change this force/counter force postulate. Hey! That's just like stated above. So in other words, one who is good at postulating and employing the 4 methods of existence can change any and all postulates, past, present and future. Well damn damn damn. All one has to do is use any type of postulate except for the not-isness postulate, huh. Don't think I have another worry in all of 'existence' now. Counter postulates are not the bugaboo but not employing the other three types of is-ness to bringing things into or out of existence is the problem. I also see that postulates do not necessarily last forever but can be changed with is-ness, as-isness and alter-isness. What a relief!!!! Does this help anyone else? TROM with RI and TimeBreaking is an exercise at employing all of the 4 states of existence and when you can apply any of the 3 states other than not-isness, one regains the use of their ability to postulate for their and others good. Just realize that if you get too good at this you can vanish all and create all newness or re- create the old. That includes you, yourself. Oh and another thing. All the levels in Level 4 & 5 are postulate/ counter postulate. So if one can get through Level 4 and any of the 8 situations, A & B, then they must be doing pretty good at handling counter postulates and finally just kicking them out of the way with the slightest of effort and attention is the final achievement of TROM. After all, games barriers are nothing but postulate/counter postulates. Likewise the walls in a maze all by themselves are postulate/counter postulates and just stand there. Will you use force (overts) or intelligence and spiritual, Theta abilities to navigate through Life. p.s.: This area of the 4 'Conditions of Existence' is one area that Dennis short shrifted and in doing so did not get all of the truth into Level 4 & 5 of TROM. _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
